Barrows v. Becerra (following Alexander v. Azar, D. Conn.)
Checked against the current rules on September 18, 2026.
Jan 25, 2022 · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Affirmed that Original Medicare patients who are admitted to a hospital as an inpatient and then reclassified to outpatient "observation" status during the same stay have a due-process right to appeal that reclassification — a right that didn't exist before this litigation.
Source.Barrows v. Becerra, 24 F.4th 116 (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2022)
What was decided
Affirmed that Original Medicare patients who are admitted to a hospital as an inpatient and then reclassified to outpatient "observation" status during the same stay have a due-process right to appeal that reclassification — a right that didn't exist before this litigation.Barrows v. Becerra, 24 F.4th 116 (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2022)
CMS's implementing final rule (CMS-4204-F) created the actual appeals process this decision required, with both a prospective process (during the stay) and a retrospective one (after discharge).Federal Register
This litigation traces back to Alexander v. Azar, filed in the District of Connecticut, where a certified class of Medicare beneficiaries argued that being reclassified from inpatient to outpatient observation status — often without being told — left them facing real financial consequences (SNF coverage denied, higher cost-sharing) with no way to challenge the reclassification itself. The Second Circuit's Barrows decision affirmed the district court's ruling in the beneficiaries' favor.
What it means for your appeal
This appeal right does NOT extend to Medicare Advantage. CMS's own final rule confirms it explicitly: the observation-status appeals process built from this case is available only to Original Medicare beneficiaries, not to Medicare Advantage enrollees.Federal Register
A Medicare Advantage plan's inpatient-vs-observation decision is instead governed by the plan's own coverage-criteria rules (42 CFR 422.101) and appealed the same way as any other coverage denial — through reconsideration, then the Independent Review Entity — not through the CMS-4204-F process this case created.42 CFR 422.101
Why does this matter to include here at all, if it doesn't apply to Medicare Advantage? Because families researching "observation status appeal rights" will find a lot written about this case and the CMS-4204-F process — and need to know clearly that it doesn't apply to them, rather than following instructions meant for a different Medicare program.
The underlying substantive question — whether a hospital stay should have been billed as inpatient or observation in the first place — is still very much appealable for a Medicare Advantage enrollee. What's different is the PROCESS: it goes through the plan's own reconsideration and IRE review, not the CMS-4204-F retrospective/prospective process built for Original Medicare.
Sources — last checked September 18, 2026
- 42 CFR 422.101as of September 18, 2026
- Barrows v. Becerra, 24 F.4th 116 (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2022)
- Federal Register
Related
Not sure what applies to your case?
Upload your denial letter and get a free, plain-language explanation with your real deadline.
By CaseWhy Appeals editorial. See how this content is produced. Not legal advice. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Medicare, CMS, or any health plan. A product of CaseWhy LLC.